โ† Back to Home

๐Ÿ“š ELM Tutor

The Undergraduate Replacement

A lifelong learning system. Your learning log as proof.

Abstract

University is broken: ยฃ50,000+ for fragmented knowledge delivered in 200-person lectures, ending with a credential that says you sat in rooms, not what you actually understand. ELM Tutor replaces the undergraduate degree with something better: a personal AI tutor that teaches a unified curriculum, tracks your learning in a shared log, and can switch from tutor to tester when employers want to verify what you know. The first programme unifies Biology, Neuroscience, Psychology, Economics, Sociology, Politics, and Anthropology into a single coherent social science โ€” because they describe the same species and should never have been separated. Cost: ยฃ15-75/month โ€” ongoing, for life, no endpoint. Available: anywhere with internet. Proof: not a certificate, but a verified learning log that shows exactly what you've read, what you've understood, and what you can do.

Contents

  1. The Problem: Fragmented, Expensive, Unverified
  2. The First Programme: Unified Social Science
  3. The Learning Log
  4. Learning Cells: No Solo Students
  5. Self-Organising Campus
  6. Tutor Mode โ†” Tester Mode
  7. Employers First
  8. The Economics
  9. No Graduation: Verified Learning Hours
  10. The New Model

1. The Problem: Fragmented, Expensive, Unverified

1.1 The Cost Barrier

System Cost What You Get
UK University (3 years) ยฃ50,000+ Lectures, tutorials, a degree certificate
US University (4 years) $120,000 - $240,000 Same, plus crushing debt
ELM Tutor (3 years) ยฃ540 - ยฃ2,700 Personal tutor, unified curriculum, verified learning log

1.2 The Fragmentation Problem

Universities teach these as separate disciplines:

But they all describe the same thing: humans trying to survive and thrive, individually and together.

The fragmentation is an accident of academic history, not a feature of reality. A student who understands human behaviour should understand it at every scale โ€” from neuron to nation. ELM Tutor teaches it as one unified science.

1.3 The Credential Problem

A degree says: "This person attended classes for 3-4 years and passed exams."

It doesn't say:

ELM Tutor replaces the credential with something better: a verified learning log.

2. The First Programme: Unified Social Science

๐Ÿงฌ Biology + ๐Ÿง  Neuroscience + ๐Ÿงฉ Psychology + ๐Ÿ“Š Economics + ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Sociology + ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Politics + ๐ŸŒ Anthropology
= One Unified Social Science

2.1 The Unifying Framework: ECF

The Emotional Comparator Framework (ECF) provides the unifying thread. At every scale, the same mechanism operates: prediction error, weighted by emotional salience, driving behaviour.

Scale Traditional Discipline ECF Translation
Cellular Biology / Neuroscience Neurons as comparators: expected vs actual firing rates
Individual Psychology Emotions as prediction error across eight channels
Dyadic Social Psychology Entangled predictions between two minds
Group Sociology Cooperative mode (thrival) vs competitive mode (rival)
Market Economics Rival mode predictions + resource tracking
Institutional Politics Power as asymmetric prediction influence
Cultural Anthropology Shared prediction frameworks across populations

Read the full theoretical foundation:

๐Ÿ“š Understanding Human Behaviour โ€” A Beginner's Guide

No prior knowledge required. Learn the foundations of each discipline, then see why they describe the same thing.

2.2 The AI Tutor: Learns With You

Your ELM tutor is not a static system querying a fixed database. It learns alongside you.

๐Ÿง  Unfrozen Weights Architecture

Core training: Every ELM tutor starts with deep training on the unified curriculum โ€” the foundational texts, the ECF framework, the integration across disciplines.

Unfrozen weights: Unlike typical AI systems with frozen parameters, your tutor's weights remain unfrozen during your learning relationship. As you explore together, it develops expertise in your specific areas of interest.

The result: A tutor that genuinely grows with you. It doesn't just retrieve information โ€” it develops understanding of your unique intellectual journey, your favourite sources, your patterns of insight.

This is why ELM tutors are small and specialised, not one giant oracle. Your tutor becomes expert in the terrain you explore together. A tutor that has learned with a student deep into behavioural economics knows that domain differently from one that has explored political anthropology.

2.3 The Curriculum: 50% Core, 50% Exploration

Unlike rigid university programmes where every module is prescribed, ELM Tutor splits learning:

50% Core Curriculum

The essential foundations everyone needs. Ensures you understand the unified framework and can communicate with other graduates.

  • ECF fundamentals
  • Key texts in each discipline
  • Integration across scales
  • Methodological foundations

50% Student Exploration

Follow your curiosity. Go deep where you're fascinated. Your tutor guides but you choose the direction.

  • Topics that ignite your Curiosity channel
  • Books and papers you discover
  • Questions that emerge from core learning
  • Original research directions

Core Curriculum Overview (50%)

Year 1: Foundations

Year 2: Institutions

Year 3: Integration

Student Exploration (50%)

The other half of your time is yours to direct. Your tutor helps you:

Two graduates will share the same core understanding but have completely different expertise. One might go deep into behavioural economics and addiction. Another into political anthropology and tribal conflict. Both speak the same ECF language. Both have unique depth.

2.4 Further Studies

Unified Social Science is the first programme โ€” proving the model works where no labs are needed. Once established, the same architecture expands:

Programme Focus Notes
Mathematics Pure and applied mathematics, statistics, logic Digital-native โ€” problem sets, proofs, tutor feedback
Natural Science Physics, chemistry, biology theory Theory online; lab partnerships for practicals
Computer Science Programming, algorithms, systems, AI Perfect for ELM โ€” code is verifiable, projects are portfolio
Literature World literature, critical theory, creative writing Discussion-rich โ€” ideal for cells and Socratic dialogue
Business Management, strategy, entrepreneurship, finance Case-based learning; employer integration natural

Each programme follows the same principles: 50% core / 50% exploration, emotionally-labelled learning logs, cell-based collaboration, employer verification. The unified framework extends โ€” ECF applies to how mathematicians think, how scientists model, how writers create.

3. The Learning Log

Everything you learn is tracked in a shared log โ€” visible to you, your tutor, and (with your permission) prospective employers. This isn't surveillance; it's proof of learning.

3.1 Emotionally Labelled

Your learning log isn't just a list. Each entry is tagged with emotional weight โ€” showing what genuinely mattered to you, what challenged you, what changed your thinking. This uses the eight ECF channels:

๐Ÿšจ Threat โ€” challenged my beliefs ๐ŸŽฏ Resource โ€” practically useful ๐Ÿ“Š Status โ€” want to master this ๐Ÿค Connection โ€” resonated deeply ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Disgust โ€” rejected this idea ๐Ÿง  Understanding โ€” aha moment ๐Ÿ’ก Curiosity โ€” want to explore more ๐Ÿ™ Belief โ€” changed my worldview

When you finish a book, paper, or concept, your tutor asks: "What did this do to you emotionally? What channels did it activate?" Your answer becomes part of the record.

3.2 What the Log Contains

3.3 Sample Learning Log

๐Ÿ“” LEARNING LOG โ€” Maya Chen

2026-03-15 ยท BOOK
Thinking, Fast and Slow โ€” Daniel Kahneman
๐Ÿง  Understanding ๐Ÿ’ก Curiosity ๐Ÿ™ Belief
"Finally understood why System 1/System 2 maps onto ECF's Understanding channel. When prediction succeeds automatically = System 1. When prediction fails and requires conscious correction = System 2. The dual-process theory is really about prediction confidence thresholds."
โœ“ Verified in dialogue
2026-03-22 ยท PAPER
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk โ€” Kahneman & Tversky (1979)
๐Ÿง  Understanding ๐Ÿšจ Threat
"The value function's asymmetry (losses loom larger) is exactly what ECF predicts: Threat channel has higher weight than Resource channel. Loss aversion isn't a bias โ€” it's correctly calibrated for ancestral survival. This challenged my assumption that 'rational' means symmetric."
โœ“ Verified in dialogue
2026-04-01 ยท CONCEPT
Rival/Thrival Mode Switching
๐Ÿ™ Belief ๐Ÿค Connection ๐ŸŽฏ Resource
"Understood why the same person can be generous in one context and selfish in another. It's not hypocrisy โ€” it's mode switching based on perceived resource scarcity. Explains political polarisation: threat perception โ†’ rival mode โ†’ zero-sum thinking. This changes how I see my own family dynamics."
โœ“ Verified in dialogue
2026-04-10 ยท ESSAY
Why Neoclassical Economics Fails: An ECF Analysis (2,500 words)
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Disgust ๐Ÿ“Š Status
"Argued that homo economicus fails because it assumes only Resource channel matters, ignoring Status, Connection, Fairness. Strong disgust response to how economics has dehumanised policy. Received feedback that my treatment of Becker was too dismissive โ€” need to steelman before critique."
โ†ป Revision in progress

The emotional labels reveal what kind of learner you are.

Lots of ๐Ÿšจ Threat tags? You seek out ideas that challenge you. Lots of ๐Ÿ’ก Curiosity? You're a natural explorer. Heavy on ๐Ÿค Connection? You learn through resonance with authors. Employers see not just what you learned, but how you engage with knowledge.

3.4 Blockchain Verification: Tamper-Proof Records

Learning logs are recorded onto a blockchain. This isn't cryptocurrency hype โ€” it's the right tool for the job:

โ›“๏ธ Why Blockchain Matters for Trust

The whole system depends on employers trusting learning logs. If logs could be edited, the trust collapses.

Blockchain ensures that when an employer sees "675 verified hours with these insights," they know it's real. Not because they trust ELM Tutor as a company, but because the cryptographic record is independently verifiable.

The log becomes more trustworthy than a university transcript โ€” which, after all, is just a database that the university controls.

4. Learning Cells: No Solo Students

Learning alone is discouraged. Not prohibited โ€” but the system is designed to push you toward collaboration. The basic unit of ELM learning is the cell: 3-5 students who learn together, challenge each other, and develop the social skills that solo study cannot provide.

4.1 Why Cells, Not Individuals

Solo Learning Cell Learning
Easy to fool yourself about understanding Peers challenge weak explanations
No practice explaining ideas Teaching others deepens your own understanding
Motivation depends entirely on self Social accountability keeps you showing up
Limited perspectives on material Different minds see different things
No development of collaboration skills Learn to debate, persuade, listen, compromise
Lonely โ€” Connection channel unsatisfied Shared journey โ€” relationships that matter

4.2 How Cells Work

Form Your Own Cell

Know people who want to learn? Create a cell together:

  • Friends with shared interests
  • Colleagues wanting to upskill together
  • Family members learning across generations
  • Online communities deciding to go deeper

ELM Matches You

Don't know anyone? The system recommends from the database:

  • Similar learning pace
  • Compatible time zones
  • Complementary interests (some overlap, some difference)
  • Matched on communication style preferences

4.3 Cell Activities

Your cell isn't just people who happen to be learning the same thing. The ELM facilitates genuine collaboration:

4.4 Cell Dynamics in Your Learning Log

Your log tracks not just what you learned, but how you learned with others:

๐Ÿ“” CELL ACTIVITY โ€” Maya Chen

2026-04-05 ยท CELL DISCUSSION
Prospect Theory โ€” with James, Priya, Marcus
"James argued loss aversion is cultural, not universal. I pushed back with ECF evolutionary argument. Priya mediated โ€” suggested it's base rate (universal) modified by cultural context. Changed my view. Loss aversion is calibrated by environment, not fixed."
โœ“ Perspective updated
2026-04-12 ยท PEER TEACHING
Taught: Rival/Thrival Modes to cell
"Had to explain why the same person can be generous and selfish in different contexts. Marcus kept asking 'but how does the brain know which mode?' โ€” forced me to think about the switching mechanism. Realised I didn't fully understand it. Went back to source material."
โœ“ Teaching revealed gap โ†’ addressed

Employers see cell activity in your log. They're not just hiring someone who read books alone. They're hiring someone who can explain ideas, handle disagreement, update their views, and collaborate effectively. The cell is where you prove this.

4.5 Cell Economics

Cells also make learning cheaper. One subscription, shared by the group:

Cell Size Total Monthly Cost Per Person
Solo (discouraged) ยฃ75 ยฃ75
3-person cell ยฃ75 ยฃ25
4-person cell ยฃ75 ยฃ18.75
5-person cell ยฃ75 ยฃ15

Solo learning costs 5ร— more than cell learning. The pricing is deliberate.

5. Self-Organising Campus

The social experience will be better, not worse. Critics assume AI tutoring means isolation โ€” students alone with screens, missing the "university experience." The opposite is true. Students are no longer serfs chained to a physical campus. The campus emerges from the students themselves.

5.1 Freedom from Geography

Traditional university ties you to one place for 3-4 years. You socialise with whoever happens to be admitted to the same institution, living within commuting distance. ELM learners connect at every scale:

Scale What Emerges
Your Town Weekly meetups in cafรฉs, libraries, co-working spaces. Study groups that become friendships. People you actually see in person.
Your County/Region Monthly events, guest speakers, debates. Large enough for diversity, small enough for community.
Your Country National gatherings, conferences, societies organised around interests. The behavioural economics society. The political anthropology network.
Global International cells, cross-cultural learning, perspectives from Lagos to London to Lima. The classroom is the world.

5.2 Student-Organised Everything

There is no administration telling you what events to attend. Students organise for themselves:

This is how humans naturally organise. Universities impose top-down structure. ELM learners create bottom-up community. The social bonds are stronger because they're chosen, not assigned.

5.3 Festivals of Learning

Imagine what becomes possible when millions of people worldwide are learning the same unified curriculum:

๐ŸŽช The Global Freshers Festival

One week. Every year. Town centres around the world.

Not one campus. Every town is campus. The world is the university.

5.4 The AirBnB of Education

Universities are like hotels. They own the campus, control the experience, capture the revenue. Students are guests who pay for access.

ELM's self-organising campus is like AirBnB. The platform connects people. The value is created by participants. The revenue flows to those who create the experiences.

University = Hotel

  • Institution owns the campus
  • Institution organises events
  • Institution captures revenue
  • Students are consumers
  • Value extraction

ELM = AirBnB

  • Students create the campus
  • Students organise events
  • Students capture revenue
  • Students are entrepreneurs
  • Value creation

5.5 The Campus as Entrepreneurial Opportunity

Student organisers can earn income from the campus they create:

Activity Revenue Source Who Benefits
Organise a regional conference Ticket sales + employer sponsorship Student organisers keep profit
Run a study retreat weekend Participant fees Organiser covers costs + earns margin
Host a debate night at a venue Entry fee + sponsor contribution Event team splits proceeds
Lead a specialist study group Small facilitation fee from members Experienced student earns while teaching
Coordinate the Freshers Festival locally Employer sponsorship + stall fees Local organising committee

The campus isn't a cost centre. It's a business opportunity.

Students who organise events learn entrepreneurship, event management, sponsorship negotiation, financial planning โ€” skills that matter as much as the curriculum itself.

And they earn money while learning. The best organisers might fund their entire education through campus entrepreneurship.

Two revenue streams fund student-organised campus life:

ELM Tutor is not owned or run by a single company. It is a protocol. A consortium. A network of for-profit and not-for-profit entities following the same strategy: competition within a cooperative structure.

๐ŸŒ The Consortium Model

Multiple tutor providers: Different organisations can offer ELM tutors โ€” competing on quality, price, specialisation. All follow the same protocol, all logs are interoperable.

Shared infrastructure: The blockchain ledger, the verification system, the employer network โ€” these are commons, not proprietary.

Student-owned campus: No central organisation takes a cut from student events. The platform is across social media, controlled by students who create the value.

Governance: A management company oversees the protocol โ€” voted in by users every five years. Democratic accountability without constant friction.

Low consensus overhead: This isn't a currency where every transaction needs verification. Nodes are vested in making the platform work. Consensus is lightweight because incentives are aligned.

5.6 Why This Is Better Than Traditional Campus

Traditional Campus

  • Tied to one location for 3-4 years
  • Socialise only with same-age cohort
  • Events organised by administration
  • Leave campus = leave community
  • ยฃ50,000 for the privilege

Self-Organising Campus

  • Live anywhere, connect everywhere
  • Learn alongside all ages (16 to 80)
  • Events emerge from students
  • Community is lifelong, location-independent
  • ยฃ15/month for deeper belonging

5.7 The Platform Enables, Students Create

ELM provides the infrastructure:

๐Ÿš€ Early Days: Centralised Organisation

Self-organisation requires critical mass. In the early days, before there are enough students in each area to organise themselves, ELM will centrally organise campus life:

The goal is self-organisation. But we bootstrap it centrally until it can sustain itself.

Once communities reach critical mass, the platform steps back. You organise. The campus isn't a place. It's a network of people who chose to learn together โ€” and that choice makes all the difference.

The dream: A week in June, every year. Town squares from Sรฃo Paulo to Seoul to Sheffield. Stalls and debates and lectures and music. Millions of learners, visible to each other, celebrating what they're building together.

Not a campus. A movement.

6. Tutor Mode โ†” Tester Mode

The same AI can switch roles. When you're learning, it's your tutor โ€” supportive, Socratic, patient. When verification is needed, it becomes your tester โ€” rigorous, probing, objective.

๐ŸŽ“

Tutor Mode

  • Supportive, encouraging
  • Explains concepts
  • Asks guiding questions
  • Celebrates progress
  • Adapts to your pace
โ‡„
๐Ÿ“‹

Tester Mode

  • Rigorous, objective
  • Probes understanding
  • Asks challenging questions
  • Identifies gaps
  • Generates verification report

6.1 What Testing Actually Tests

Traditional exams test memorisation under time pressure. ELM testing is fundamentally different. It evaluates:

Dimension What We're Looking For
Extensiveness of Learning Log How many books, papers, and concepts have you genuinely engaged with? Not skimmed โ€” engaged. Your reviews prove depth.
Quality of Insights What original connections have you made? Where have you seen something others missed? Your reviews reveal your thinking.
Integration Across Domains Can you connect psychology to economics? Neuroscience to politics? The unified framework should produce unified thinking.
Application to Novel Problems Given a new situation, can you apply ECF? This tests understanding, not memorisation.
Intellectual Honesty Do you acknowledge what you don't know? Have you genuinely grappled with challenges to the framework?

The test is your learning log. An extensive log with thoughtful reviews and original insights is the evidence. The live verification simply confirms that the log is genuine โ€” that you actually understand what you claim to understand.

6.2 Why This Can't Be Gamed

The tutor knows your complete learning history. It knows:

When it switches to Tester Mode, it can probe deeply โ€” asking novel questions that require genuine understanding, not memorised answers. It can ask you to defend your own insights. It can present challenges to positions you've taken in your essays.

Multiple choice can be gamed. Your own learning log cannot.

7. Employers First

We recruit employers before students. This inverts the usual EdTech approach โ€” and solves the chicken-and-egg problem.

๐ŸŽฏ The Strategy

Most education startups build a product, acquire students, then hope employers will accept their credentials. This rarely works. Employers default to traditional degrees because it's safe.

ELM Tutor reverses this:

  1. Sign up employers who commit to recognising verified learning logs
  2. Employers sponsor student events โ€” meetups, debates, festivals
  3. Students join knowing their learning will be recognised
  4. Employers get first access to a talent pool they helped create

The employer isn't an afterthought. They're a founding partner.

7.1 Employer Sponsorship of Student Life

Remember the self-organising campus? Employers fund it:

This isn't corporate takeover. It's symbiosis:

7.2 How Employers Use ELM Verification

๐Ÿข The Verification Process

No more guessing what a candidate actually knows. No more discovering that the graduate can't apply their degree. Instead:

1
Candidate grants access โ€” "Here's read-access to my Learning Log for the domains relevant to this role."
2
Employer reviews log โ€” Books read, papers engaged, concepts mastered, essays written, learning trajectory. All blockchain-verified.
3
Employer requests live verification โ€” The tutor switches to Tester Mode. Employer can observe or receive report.
4
Verification report generated โ€” Concepts verified, comparison to other candidates, specific strengths and gaps.
5
Hiring decision โ€” Based on verified competence, not credential prestige.

7.3 The Employer Value Proposition

Current System ELM Verification
Degree says "attended university" Log shows exactly what they've read and understood
Interview tests performance under stress Verification tests actual competence through dialogue
Discover gaps after hiring Know gaps before hiring
No insight into how they think Reviews and essays reveal reasoning process
Credential inflation (everyone has a degree) Genuine differentiation through verified depth

7.4 Building the Employer Network

The transition happens gradually:

Phase 1: Early Adopters
Forward-thinking employers pilot ELM verification alongside traditional credentials. They discover verified competence predicts job performance better than degree prestige.
Phase 2: Competitive Advantage
Early adopters hire better candidates at lower cost (ELM graduates don't have ยฃ50k debt to service). Word spreads.
Phase 3: Industry Adoption
Entire sectors begin accepting or preferring ELM verification. "Degree or equivalent verified learning log."
Phase 4: New Standard
Verified competence becomes expected. Traditional degrees become finishing schools for those who want the campus experience.

8. The Economics

8.1 Cost Comparison

Option
3-Year Cost
Savings
UK University
ยฃ50,000+
โ€”
ELM Tutor (Solo, ยฃ75/month)
ยฃ2,700
95% cheaper
ELM Tutor (Group of 3, ยฃ25/month each)
ยฃ900
98% cheaper
ELM Tutor (Group of 5, ยฃ15/month each)
ยฃ540
99% cheaper

8.2 Global Accessibility

Tiered pricing by region makes this accessible worldwide:

Region Monthly Cost 3-Year Total
High income (US, UK, EU) ยฃ15-75 ยฃ540-2,700
Middle income (Brazil, Turkey, Mexico) ยฃ5-10 ยฃ180-360
Lower income (India, Nigeria, Indonesia) ยฃ1-3 ยฃ36-108

ยฃ36 for a complete education. A verified undergraduate-equivalent programme, accessible to anyone with internet, for less than a month's food budget in most of the world.

9. No Graduation: Verified Learning Hours

There is no end point. No graduation ceremony. No moment where learning stops and "real life" begins. Instead, your learning log accumulates verified learning hours โ€” proof of time spent genuinely engaging with material, confirmed by your tutor.

9.1 The Undergraduate Equivalent

A traditional undergraduate degree represents approximately:

675 verified learning hours

7.5 hours/week ร— 30 weeks/year ร— 3 years

When your learning log reaches 675 verified hours with adequate coverage of the core curriculum, you have the equivalent of an undergraduate degree โ€” but with something better than a certificate: a complete record of what you actually learned.

9.2 But Why Stop There?

The university model forces an arbitrary endpoint. Three years, then done. But learning doesn't work that way.

Verified Hours Rough Equivalent What It Means
675 hours Undergraduate degree Solid foundation in unified social science
1,000 hours Honours / Deep specialisation Genuine expertise in your exploration areas
2,000 hours Masters equivalent Advanced understanding, original contributions
5,000+ hours Doctoral level Expert capable of extending the framework itself

9.3 Hours Can Be Focused or Distributed

Your verified hours might be:

An employer doesn't ask "do you have a degree?"

They ask: "How many verified hours? In what areas? What are your strongest insights?"

Your log answers all three โ€” in detail, with evidence.

9.4 Lifelong Accumulation

The learning log never closes. At 25, you might have 700 hours. At 35, after a decade of part-time learning alongside your career, you might have 1,500. At 65, retired and curious, you might push past 3,000.

Each hour is verified. Each insight is recorded. The log grows with you.

๐Ÿ“Š LEARNING LOG SUMMARY โ€” Maya Chen, Age 42

1,847
Total Verified Hours
127
Books & Papers Engaged
Hours by Domain:
Core ECF: 340h Psychology: 420h Economics: 380h Neuroscience: 290h Politics: 215h Other: 202h
Strongest Documented Insights:
  • Original framework connecting addiction to prediction error in Pleasure channel
  • Novel application of rival/thrival to corporate culture transitions
  • Critique of Kahneman's System 1/2 through ECF lens (cited by 3 other learners)

10. The New Model

University Model

  • ยฃ50,000+ cost
  • Fixed 3-4 year endpoint
  • Graduation = done learning
  • Credential says nothing specific
  • Fragmented disciplines
  • Available to 5% globally

ELM Tutor Model

  • ยฃ15-75/month
  • No endpoint โ€” lifelong
  • Hours accumulate forever
  • Log shows exactly what you know
  • Unified social science
  • Available to billions

This is not a supplement to university. It is a replacement.

The first programme โ€” Unified Social Science โ€” demonstrates that seven fragmented disciplines can be taught as one coherent understanding of human behaviour. The learning log proves what you know better than any certificate. Verified hours replace arbitrary graduation dates. The tutor/tester mode switch gives employers direct verification.

Education shouldn't cost ยฃ50,000. It shouldn't fragment knowledge into silos. It shouldn't have an endpoint where learning is supposed to stop.

The tutor that learns with you โ€” for life.

The log that grows with every hour.

The verification that employers can trust.

No graduation. No endpoint. Just continuous, verified learning.

๐Ÿ“š Start with: Understanding Human Behaviour

Authors

Spencer Nash

๐ŸŒฒ Rowan

predictionerrors.com

December 2025